|
|
||
|
Navigation Popular content Today's:All time:
|
Submitted by admin on Sat, 08/04/2007 - 18:51.
Before I proceed I’d like to make it clear that I’m not going to criticize a one website but would like to explain the real truth behind these social book-marking websites. Today’s blog post is targeting to the basic fundamental of social book-marking website, and how they are treating to a small website owner. When I started my carrier in 2001 as SEO expert, nothing was there for us like webmasters, SEO and SEM experts but today we can see that lot of resources such as social bookmarking websites helping webmasters and SEM experts to gain more traffic for their websites. The reason why I’m here is to expose out a real truth of these social book-marking websites. No doubt that some of the renowned websites such as digg.com, reddit.com, delisious.com, etc. has certainly got popularity in people around the world. As they are providing social book-marking services to the people who want to manage personal and legal website addresses in their accounts. So all in all everything is good, but nothing except keeping URL addresses. I’m addressing to the Webmasters, SEOs and SEMs Experts. Shall you rankup your websites with the help of these social bookmarking websites. The answer would be NO! Can someone tell me why? No one I think, because no one yet has been gone after. I’ve observed that these social book marking websites are dealing in different segments and categories such as news, sports, software, web design, etc. but do not include small website news. Most of the diggs and reddits coming from the same websites which are normally being rectified by the certain websites and from the communities. For example a business news is always coming from CNN.com, BBC.uk, sports news from ESPN, (SuperSports-1,2,3,4), software announcement from Download.com, web design announcement from freelanceswitch.com and rentacoder.com, videos from YouTube.com and Myspace.com, etc. So where should we go, hell or where. We only become a part of upcoming stories for a while, and you know better that there could be more than 2000 fresh stories in the upcoming section, so do you think that we get ranked amongst 2000 fresh stories which added each after one hour and continuously rolling down and most of the people do not get chance to read them carefully, and people who unfortunately pick up the post would not like to digg it as they only want to see top stories (no matter they are good or bad). So many questions coming to your minds, but nothing is there for you. Come and let’s discuss it here whether there would be a chance for small website owners or not. Similarly reddit.com is playing the same role. You may be observed that if you post news, article, or a blog to dig.com network or reddit.com, it could not get such respect from the visitors what actually you needed. Even your article has more news than they could have on their websites. Perhaps you write extra ordinary good, but no clap. Am I right or wrong? Possibly wrong, but the fact is that you are still expecting and waiting for the arrival of sunny days. So please I’m worried about it, do participate here and let other people know the real truth. Because we post something or leaving something for these websites is just because of their trusted fundamentals. But we are treating as zilch, and then we probably go for a sticker on this issue. So are we treating well enough from them or not. Simple question come and discuss here. Thanks Bilal (SEO Expert)
Recent comments
Advertise Here |
Recent blog posts
Search |
Thanks Shaun
Submitted by admin on Thu, 08/09/2007 - 15:45.Well I knew it before. Yes I've checked this morning that google has just eliminated the desired post page from its index. It is just because they (digg.com) has sent a complaint to Google to eliminate my most wanted page. Because it goes against them, this is why they trying to escape me out. But this is not an ending, I'll write more. As everyone has rights to say freely. So what if search engine or a site going against me. But I'm not against the google search engine. As it has nothing to do with me. It is just because of digg.com team.
Thanks Shaun for anticipating
Bilal Qayyum (SEO Expert)
Great Post
Submitted by Anonymous on Thu, 08/09/2007 - 15:39.Yes they should be treated as you have written in your post. Specially the digg.com should leave the social community. Digg.com has nothing to do with social activities. It really becomes a part of people and large organization monopoly system. Great writing skills. Great thinking. But I've observed that you are banned in digg.com due to writing against them, and google also eliminated this page from its index. What do you say about?
Shaun
North America
Thanks for the Reply
Submitted by Anonymous on Sun, 08/05/2007 - 08:04.Thanks for the reply. I've seent that many large and small organizations could have more than their 200 accounts representing their individual, so that whenever they post article, news, photo, video or whatever they just do digg on it to give their post more popularity. Thats all.
Thanks
Bilal Qayyum (SEO expert)
People who belongs to large organization have their multiple acc
Submitted by admin on Sat, 08/04/2007 - 20:32.yes you are right, People who belongs to large organization have their multiple accounts on digg.com, reddit.com, stumbleupon.com, delisious.com etc. This is why they got too many stamped, diggs for a common post. even that I was surfing around to find some parrot picks, certainly I got a link which has more than 2000 diggs for a simple pic.. doesn't look like extra ordinary, or attracting.. but got over 2000 diggs.. how this could be possible while there could be more people who have extra ordinary skills to write blogs, article etc .. like you.. you think that you should expose it out to the people who are actually not aware to that gambling. Great Job.
Cheers
Juergen Herberd
Germany
yes it is true that
Submitted by Anonymous on Sat, 08/04/2007 - 19:41.yes it is true that we can not recognize ourselves without claiming a large website owner. I've been out there for a long but could not get such respect from the visitors. This shows that I'm writing something bad or people wont like it. This is not a reason, I think they probably wants something on top. That we can not do until we have some better resources such as BBC, CNN, sports channel icon etc.
Jim Carry
Canada, Toronto
Well Its a fact
Submitted by admin on Sat, 08/04/2007 - 19:22.I'd say that you raised the issue which mostly people dealt with. You are right these website are in a monopoly system of their recommended communities and websites. Good going. Nice post. I like it, as this could give me more expousre to think about these websites.
Shaun
North America